Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Are Back: More “Adjustments”, More Calls For Reform

The following is an excellent article from the website written by Francine on May 12, 2014 titled “Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Are Back: More “Adjustments”, More Calls fro Reform” and I quote:

“Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac Are Back: More “Adjustments”, More Calls For Reform”

By Francine • May 12th, 2014 • Category: Pure Content, You Can Quote Me On That

American Banker reported on Friday that, “The chance of any housing finance reform bill moving in Congress this year — as well as in the foreseeable future — is now seriously in question…”

That is too bad, since something must surely be done about recidivist accounting screw-ups Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Dan Freed of reported on Thursday. (He’s added a followup with another quote from me today.)

Fannie Mae (FNMA) quietly acknowledged several errors in its financial statements that have largely gone unnoticed, even by sophisticated investors who made daring contrarian bets on the turnaround of the controversial mortgage giant.

Fannie Mae reported the errors, which add up to nearly $4 billion, during five consecutive quarters from the fourth quarter of 2011 through the fourth quarter of 2012 and also in the second quarter of 2010.

How could such large errors go unnoticed for so long?  (The New York Times’ Floyd Norris asked my favorite question when Bank of America recently admitted to the same kid of thing: Where was Bank of America’s auditor PwC when the bank was putting the wrong number, by billions, in its MD&A disclosures year after year?)

While Fannie Mae did disclose the errors, one reason they did not attract more scrutiny is likely the manner in which they were disclosed — as out-of-period adjustments rather than restatements. In correspondence with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Fannie Mae took the position that the errors were too small to be of much interest to investors.

In an Aug. 30 letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission, explaining $528 million worth of adjustments in the first half of 2012, Fannie Mae CFO Susan McFarland (who left Fannie Mae in 2013) wrote:

We do not plan to include disclosure regarding how these misstatements were discovered in our future filings because we believe the effects of these misstatements, both quantitatively and qualitatively, are not material to prior periods or to our projected annual 2012 income; therefore we do not believe additional information regarding the detection of these items would be meaningful to investors.

The SEC followed up on the issue, we learn from McFarland’s response to the SEC on Dec. 13. Among the SEC’s requests:

Please provide your analysis supporting your conclusion that you do not have a material weakness with respect to the accounting for the allowance for loan losses and reserve for guaranty losses as of December 31, 2011 and discuss any new processes or procedures you have put in place to prevent these types of errors from recurring in the future.

McFarland’s response contended in part that the adjustments did not indicate a “material weakness” because they were relatively small.

These misstatements were less than 2% of our allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2011 and less than 5% of our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2011. Additionally, we concluded that the misstatements were not material to our projected 2012 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

However, they grew larger. The additional $850 million and $172 million discovered in the third and fourth quarters, respectively, were not discussed in this correspondence, even though the $850 million was already disclosed at the time of the second letter.

Dan Freed asked for my comments and added them to the story after it was initially published. You can sum them up with this one:

McKenna says many companies classify mistakes as out-of-period adjustments because restatements are more likely to cause the stock to drop, which can lead to lawsuits.

More important, however, formal restatements require an 8-K filing with the SEC, which gives companies or their regulators the ability to claw back executive compensation under the 2002 Sarbanes Oxley Act. While the 2010 Dodd Frank legislation made it easier in some respects to claw back executive compensation, companies can still use out-of-period adjustments to skate around the issue, McKenna says.

While the SEC could require a restatement, it has not shown a willingness to pursue these cases aggressively and in all possible circumstances, McKenna contends.

I’ve written about the stealth restatement problem, the SEC’s clawback problem, materiality, and the chronic accounting ineptitude that adds up to recklessness at Fanni… more than once and for a while. does a nice job summing up the problem of allowing the GSE’s to continue to make excuses:

“…this isn’t Fannie Mae’s first rodeo. If accounting errors were felonies in California, Fannie Mae would already be serving life under Three Strikes.

See 2005: Fannie Mae Finds More Errors, Names New CFO

2006: Still More Errors Are Found in Accounting at Fannie Mae

See also, this 2006 SEC complaint, which saw Fannie settling with a $400 million penalty:

In its federal court Complaint, the Commission charged that, between 1998 and 2004, Fannie Mae engaged in a financial fraud involving multiple violations of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) in connection with the preparation of its annual and quarterly financial statements. These violations had the effect, among other things, of falsely portraying stable earnings growth and reduced income statement volatility, and – for year-ended 1998 – of maximizing bonuses and achieving forecasted earnings.

So you see, Fannie is a habitual offender. One can only deduce that they are either really, really bad at accounting (possible) or doing this on purpose (also possible). Olga Usvyatsky of Audit Analytics seems to feel maybe it is just an honest mistake but our pal Francine McKenna does not share that opinion.

Olga Usvyatsky, an accountant with a research firm called Audit Analytics, believes the errors may point to “control deficiencies” — a catch-all accounting phrase that encompasses issues such as poorly trained or inadequate staffing, inadequate technological capabilities or ineffective business processes, among other examples.

“From what I see on the surface, it does not look like intentional manipulation,” she said. “It looks more like [the] financial statements in general are not very reliable because they keep finding those errors.”

Leave it to Francine to point out the obvious: when you do the math on numerous immaterial errors, it adds up to one big error. Now where have we seen that before?

“How do you know? That’s the WorldCom situation. Nobody adds it all up until someone says ‘Wait a minute. Over five years we’ve had so many billions of non-material errors it adds up to be material.’”

Fannie Mae’s auditor is Deloitte. You may recall that KPMG used to audit Fannie Mae. In 2010 I wrote at Forbes that Fannie and Freddie must go.

Fannie Mae’ s external auditor until 2005 was KPMG. Fannie Mae and KPMG finally settled their lawsuits against each other this past May.

That baggage didn’t bother Deloitte, who jumped at the chance to get close to Fannie when her dance card opened.

Freddie Mac’s external auditor is PwC, who never abandons a sinking ship even when that client sues them repeatedly.

PwC inherited that mess from Arthur Andersen.

Four years later I haven’t changed my mind.”


LaVern Isely, Overtaxed Independent Middle Class Taxpayer and Public Citizen and AARP Members


About tim074

I'm a retired dairy farmer that was a member of the National Farmer's Organization (NFO). Before going farming, I spent 4 years in the United States Air Force where I saved up enough money to get my down payment to go farming. I also enjoy writing and reading biographies and I write about myself as well as articles and excerpts I find interesting. I'm specifically interested in finances, particularly in the banking industry because if it wasn't for help from my local Community Bank, I never could have started farming which I was successful at. So, I'm real interested in the Small Business Administration and I know they are the ones creating jobs. I have been a member of Common Cause and am now a member of Public Citizen as well as AARP. I have, in the past, written over 150 articles on the Obama Blog ( and I'd like to tie these two sites together. I'm also on Twitter, MySpace and Facebook and find these outlets terrifically interesting particularly what many of these people did concerning the uprising in the Arab world. I believe this is a smaller world than we think it is and my goal is to try to bring people together to live in peace because management needs labor like labor needs management. Up to now, that hasn't been so easy to find.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s