The Progressive Populist: Who Really is the Crook?

The following is an excellent article written by Stephen A. Hopkins in the November 15, 2016 issue of The Progressive Populist on page 4 titled “Who Really is the Crook?” and i quote:

“Who Really is the Crook?”

By STEPHEN A. HOPKINS

As an important feature of Donald Trump’s ongoing campaigns during the primaries, he routinely labelled his opponents with insulting comments, such words as “liar,” “wimpy”, “goofy loudmouth” and “sleaze.” Yet this seemed to work with certain segments of the GOP as he moved through the primary season with commanding support. Now that he faces the main election in November, he again is using insulting adjectives against his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, regularly referring to her as “crooked Hillary” and that she “ought to be jailed.” Maybe he thinks that if he says it often enough, people will begin to believe it.

Not happy with the decision of the director of the FBI, James Comey, not to indict Clinton with regard to the much publicized use of private emails while she was Secretary of State, he accused him of “poor judgement.” Comey, a Republican who worked in the Bush administration, has had many years of experience in law enforcement, but Trump, who has no background in this area at all, thinks he knows more than Comey about what it takes to return an indictment. But what can you expect from this man with the gigantic ego? Other Republicans piled on in attacking Comey and Clinton such as Paul Ryan who also has no background in law enforcement.

Having been so successful with insulting opponents in the past, he is using the same tactic now, not realizing that they may have worked with the smaller group on the right wingers in the primaries, but not so good in the general election. He also overlooks or ignores the fact that if anybody ought to be labelled a crook, it is The Donald himself. Just take a look at the evidence in the Trump University in which many former students of the so-called “University” claim they were victimized as a result of Trump’s fraud by which he made millions.

Trump University was set up by Trump in 2005 and over 7,600 students eventually signed up, paying amounts ranging from $1,500 to $35,000 in fees. The school took in some $40 million in fees and Trump received five million dollars from these proceeds. His enterprise failed and closed in 2010.

Trump’s lawyers had earlier moved to have him dismissed from one case, claiming that he had nothing to do with the operations of the ”University” (itself is a misnomer because the organization was never certified as a university). This absurd contention was made even though there was evidence that Trump appeared in a video distributed to prospective enrollees, in which he extolled the courses he was offering with instructions as to his renowned skills in real estate transactions, saying they could eventually “lead to a graduate degree.” He also said that he had personally selected the instructors for their expertise and knowledge of his secrets.

He later acknowledged in a deposition in the case that he never had met any of the instructors or even knew who they were. He made other statements aimed at enticing the unsuspecting into signing up as students, some paying as much as $35,000, being required to use their credit cards or savings to do so. The presiding federal judge, Gonzalo Curiel, denied the motion which sought to have Trump dismissed.

Trump attacked Judge Curiel in one of the class actions in California (there is a second class action in California and a third in New York City) in which the judge ruled that the defendants had to produce booklets distributed to so-called course instructors which talked about how they were to handle students so as to encourage them to enroll in more expensive courses. Trump’s lawyers were obviously concerned about what the booklets revealed and opposed production, claiming they were trade secrets and irrelevant, both wholly unfounded claims. Needless to say, Judge Curiel denied the objections.

Shortly after this, Trump, as is so common, attacked the judge personally, claiming the judge hated Trump and was prejudiced as a Hispanic against him because of the positions Trump had taken about Hispanics. Trump contended on TV that Curiel should step down because he had “an absolute conflict of interest,” an unprecedented claim. Trump was making all these wild accusations against a sitting judge, and yet his attorneys did not file a motion to support him which would have been the more appropriate move.

Trump should be more careful about calling Clinton a “crook” because the media could (or should) look into the evidence in the Trump cases to find out who really is the crook. What Trump said about his “University” in enticing unsuspecting students to enroll was outright fraud, probably criminal in nature. And the Trump University cases are not the only such situation in which those who trusted Trump and invested in one of the enterprises he promoted only to lose money in doing so.

Stephen A. Hopkins is a retired trial lawyer in Boston.

From The Progressive Populist, November 15, 2016″

(YOU ARE PICKING A PERSON HERE FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATED.  AFTER READING THIS ARTICLE, DONALD TRUMP HAS A LOT MORE FAULTS THAN HILLARY CLINTON, WHOSE ONLY REAL FAULT HAS BEEN HOW SHE HAS CONDUCTED HERSELF WHEN SHE SERVED AS SEC OF STATE FOR PRES OBAMA IN HIS FIRST TERM IN HOW THEY HANDLED BENGHAZI WHERE FOUR PEOPLE GOT KILLED AND MOST OF THAT PROBLEM WAS CAUSED BY THE REPUBLICAN-CONTROLLED CONGRESS, WHO DIDN’T GIVE PRES OBAMA ENOUGH FUNDING FOR SECURITY TO PROTECT U.S. AMBASSADOR CHRIS STEVENS.  THE FBI HAS INVESTIGATED THIS INCIDENT AND HILLARY HAS TESTIFIED IN FRONT OF CONGRESS NUMEROUS TIMES AND THEY  FOUND THAT SHE HAD REALLY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE DEATH OF THESE FOUR AMERICANS.  SHE WAS AGAIN VINDICATED BY THE FBI AFTER SOME EMAILS WERE FOUND ON FORMER CONGRESSMAN ANTHONY WEINER’S LAPTOP.  ON THE OTHER HAND, DONALD TRUMP HAS A LOT MORE PROBLEMS–FINANCIALLY, AND MORALLY IN THE WAY DONALD TREATS WOMEN WHICH WOULD MAKE HILLARY CLINTON A FAR SUPERIOR CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

LaVern Isely, Progressive, Overtaxed, Independent Middle Class Taxpayer and Public Citizen Member and USAF Veteran

Advertisements

About tim074

I'm a retired dairy farmer that was a member of the National Farmer's Organization (NFO). Before going farming, I spent 4 years in the United States Air Force where I saved up enough money to get my down payment to go farming. I also enjoy writing and reading biographies and I write about myself as well as articles and excerpts I find interesting. I'm specifically interested in finances, particularly in the banking industry because if it wasn't for help from my local Community Bank, I never could have started farming which I was successful at. So, I'm real interested in the Small Business Administration and I know they are the ones creating jobs. I have been a member of Common Cause and am now a member of Public Citizen as well as AARP. I have, in the past, written over 150 articles on the Obama Blog (my.barackobama.com) and I'd like to tie these two sites together. I'm also on Twitter, MySpace and Facebook and find these outlets terrifically interesting particularly what many of these people did concerning the uprising in the Arab world. I believe this is a smaller world than we think it is and my goal is to try to bring people together to live in peace because management needs labor like labor needs management. Up to now, that hasn't been so easy to find.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s